-The name of the institute and the department is not written.

- Study Type: Written other and written رسالة دكتوراه

- Submission Type: Written Re-submission?

- Fund amount: Written 15 Without specifying what?

- A contract between the PI and the funding agent: Form 85 was not attached and the file is empty, it says 'not available'.

-Co-Investigators from 1 to 4: Written in The procedure he /she is responsible for: مشرف أول من المركز القومى للبحوث مشرف من كليه الزراعه - جامعه بنها - مشرف من 

- Subject Area: Written other and written دراستى تعتمد على تطوير بعض الصناعات الغذائية لزيادة قيمتها الغذائية

- Primary Objective (s): Not written well. And written تحقيق أحد أهداف الإستدامه وذلك من خلال تقليل هدر التمور بإستخدامها فى تطوير بعض المنتجات لزيادة قيمتها الغذائية

- Secondary Objectives: Not written well. And written دراسة التركيب الكيميائى لبعض أصناف التمور و دراسة التركيب الكيميائى للمنتجات المنتجه منها

- Background: The end of the first paragraph:% والألياف الغذائية بنسبة تتراوح بين 5.40 و69.90

هذا الرقم 69.90 خطا و اعتقد الصح 9.90%

- Background: It's all written in Arabic.

- Procedure in Details: Starting with the nutritional analysis of dates, we should begin with the dates themselves (how they are collected, the variety, and whether they are fresh, semi-dry, or dry).

- He did not mention anything about the different assessments.

- There are missing sections because after number 1 comes 4 then 5.

- The basis of the work is production carbonated date beverage, and an analog of Nutella. And nothing was mentioned about the method of production.

- Product Evaluation: Evaluating sensory properties: Nothing was written about how to implement it (type, number of volunteers, the parameters, and Consent Form).

- Microbiological evaluation (bacteria, yeasts, fungi) at different storage periods. Nothing was written about how to implement it.

- In all the different evaluations, nothing was mentioned about how they were conducted.

- Gantt and Flowcharts: Repeated, it contains the same content mentioned before in Procedure in Details.

- Gantt Chart: It was not attached any diagram. And written الخطة البحثية لا تتضمن هذا الموضوع

- Flowcharts: It was not attached any diagram. And written 3-4 lines of text.

- In response to a question (Does this protocol involve the use of substances that may pose any health risk). The answer No. How?. The work involves the use of chemicals - microbiological work.

- List of References: It lists 43 references but does not cite any of them in the text.

- Acute toxicity, LD50, Effective dose , and Side effects: Written الخطه البحثيه لا تضمن مثل هذه البيانات

It is correct to write that this is a food product and has no problems.

- The taxonomical identification of plants by specialized Taxonomist: Written Date classification without mentioning any person or Accredited place.

- The efficacy of herbal samples: Written لا يوجد

- Consent form: Attached Form 85. And there is no Consent form. How? and the proposal includes Sensory Evaluating.

- In response to a question (Purpose of the Waiver Request): The answer is unclear and inaccurate.

- Commitment Form: The signing date is not written.